One of the things people don’t understand about buying gold for
diversification is that it doesn’t work all the time.
It works over time.
That means that you can’t simply switch from one asset class to another when
the going gets tough and expect miracles. Nor can you expect higher returns.
And that’s the really cruel part.
Many so-called alternative investments, gold being the most notable, are
being sold right now on the basis of recent high returns to salivating investors
desperate to stop the bleeding in their portfolios.
No question, the yellow metal offers diversification; but near all time
highs, its “protection” is debatable at best, when viewed against the harsh
light of historical data.
Which is why, at the risk of receiving some very testy email, we have to
point out that if you bought gold the last time it was this high, you’d probably
regret it now. If you had invested $10,000 in gold in January 1980, the current
value of your investment would be $10,600.
Now, compare that to the $279,000 you would have if you had
invested that same $10,000 in the S&P 500 Index in January 1980 and you’ll
see what I mean.
Does this mean that gold is worthless when it comes to riding out tough
markets?
No. Not for a New York minute.
Gold remains a powerful hedge and one that every investor should think about…
but for reasons that are not commonly understood.
You see, while gold has never been proven to be a statistically viable
inflation protector, it has a significantly correlated 10 to 1 relationship with
interest rates and bond prices which, as you know, react to inflation.
Therefore, if interest rates rise by 1%, the face value of bonds should fall 10%
but gold should rise by 100%.
Which suggests that 10% of the value of a bonds ought to be put in gold… as a
hedge.
Here’s how such an example would work.
If we allocate $10,000 to this strategy, $9,000 would go into bonds and
$1,000 into gold. If rates rise by 1% (as they’re likely to do and then some),
the bonds should fall 10% to $8,100 and the gold should rise by approximately
100% to $2,000. Overall, my portfolio would be worth $10,100 (give or take),
which is right about where we started.
That suggests a portfolio of bonds and gold is safer than either bonds or
gold in isolation.
Obviously, gold has been bid up substantially in recent months so the 100%
rise we expect based on historical patterns may not be as extreme, nor may it
rise another 100% from current levels, but the point remains valid - we don’t
buy gold because it hedges bad times.
We buy it because gold protects the income stream we get from our bonds…
particularly when the economy is facing severe inflationary pressures like it is
now.
So how do we make our move and when?
Everybody has their own preferences for gold investing, including us. There
are mining companies, bullion, coins and even jewelry. We prefer the SPDR Gold
Trust ETF (GLD). There’s no delivery risk, it’s liquid, and you can buy and
sell easily through any online brokerage. Plus, as so many residents who lived
through Hurricane Katrina found out, you don’t have to worry about Mother Nature
or hooligans stealing it either.
As for when to buy, now is probably a pretty good time. The U.S. Federal
Reserve has only just begun to acknowledge the inflationary embers it’s been
fanning for a long time. And, as usual, they’re dramatically underestimating the
9%-10% we’re feeling in our pockets. So, even if they don’t officially raise
rates, odds are that the markets will anyway as traders cope with rising costs
on their own.
Though, as you might suspect, there is a downside.
By taking part of the portfolio that would otherwise be placed in bonds and
presumably generating income, this strategy dampens the returns we could
potentially achieve with bonds.
But given gold’s protective qualities over time, we think that’s a
good bet.