Enter Symbol
Enter Search String
Join Blog Network
Alerts by Email
Research Articles
Stock Ranking Changes
Related RSS Feeds

submit article
Electric Cars , Part 2
By: Chris   Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:41 PM
Sectors: Auto/Tire/Trucks
Send Email Email
View Comments Comments (1)
Bookmark It 
I already talked about the ambiguity surrounding the Chevy Volt, but I saw something interesting in CNN Money today, concerning T. Boon Pickens’ ideals of a wind powered nation. In case you’re unfamiliar with the framework of his plan, here is a very brief synopsis, via CNN’s summary:

T. Boone Pickens, the billionaire oilman, has been hitting the airwaves, pitching a plan to use wind to replace all the natural gas that’s used to produce electricity, then using that saved natural gas to fuel cars.

While that’s interesting, it isn’t what caught my eye:

While automakers are betting on electric cars as the vehicle of the future, those electric cars will still need backup engines to recharge the battery on long trips, at least for the foreseeable future.

Those backup engines could run on natural gas, said Julius Pretterebner, a vehicles and alternative-fuels expert at Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

Pretterebner also pointed to a host of other reasons why natural gas in cars is a good idea: It’s about half as expensive as gasoline and 30% cleaner; the infrastructure to get it to service stations already exists; it’s relatively cheap to convert existing cars ($500 to $2,000 per car, he said); and natural gas can be carbon neutral, if it’s made from plants, a process he said requires no new technology.

That sounds pretty cool to me…the only problem I have is one which stems from lack of understanding (I’m not exactly a bio-chemistry whiz, so I’ll have to leave the dynamics of this study to the engineers back at Lehigh to explain to me). His thoughts are clear, but I find it peculiar that we haven’t heard this concession before…Did this guy just figure out that the infrastructure for natural gas has been available for use to the general public throughout oil’s 70% ascent year to date?

Other than that, the article highlights the short-term difficulty of converting to wind power, because the applicable tax credits expire every 2 years.

Regardless of the oil industry’s apologetic laws, like this tax credit policy, I think that with the right government, this issue gets straightened out. Look at what was accomplished when our backs were against the wall under this regime of bad government? Hank Paulson pulled that bail out plan together pretty fast…




Your Rating: Current Rating:

More Options





Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 300 contributors and press releases, SEC filings and full text news from thousands of sources.


Post Comment
Name :
Alert for new comments:
Your Email :
Your email will not be shared or displayed on site.
Title :
Comment:
 


Comments
GM is way ahead of Pickens
Posted by:   Jul 23, 2008 06:02 PM

That's why they call the platform of the Volt the E-Flex - because you can use anything your heart desires as the RANGE EXTENDER. And it doesn't recharge the battery - it powers the car - recharging the batteres using 40 cent per kilowatt hour electricity from burning liquid fuel makes no sense, and wouldn't allow the car to accept a full charge at your destination. Right now there is a Caddy version with afuel cell,which accepts hydrogen, which could be produced by Pickens' otherwise useless windmills. Pickens just never understood the instrinsic unreliability of wind. Spain has halted all subsideis of wind and moved them to solar thermal, a technology that actually makes some sense. Wind is passe. Nobody is putting venture capital into this crappy and primitive technology.

 
  Home | Login |Research | Earnings | Scans | Chat Rooms | Charts | Submit Article | Join Blog Network | Contributors | Subscribe to RSS

copryright 2008 all rights reserved