Enter Symbol
Enter Search String
Foreign Stocks: Wall Street is Screaming Buy, Should you Run the Other Way?
By: Money and Markets   Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:29 PM
Sectors: Computer and Technology , Finance , Utilities
Symbols: AIG, CHL, KEP, LEH, TM, TSM
Join Blog Network
Alerts by Email
Research Articles
Stock Ranking Changes
Related RSS Feeds

AIG Headline Feed

AIG Feed Add to Google: AIG Feed Add to Yahoo: AIG Feed

CHL Headline Feed

CHL Feed Add to Google: CHL Feed Add to Yahoo: CHL Feed

KEP Headline Feed

KEP Feed Add to Google: KEP Feed Add to Yahoo: KEP Feed

LEH Headline Feed

LEH Feed Add to Google: LEH Feed Add to Yahoo: LEH Feed

TM Headline Feed

TM Feed Add to Google: TM Feed Add to Yahoo: TM Feed

TSM Headline Feed

TSM Feed Add to Google: TSM Feed Add to Yahoo: TSM Feed

All Symbols

AIG,CHL,KEP,LEH,TM,TSM, Feed Add to Google: AIG,CHL,KEP,LEH,TM,TSM, Feed Add to Yahoo: AIG,CHL,KEP,LEH,TM,TSM, Feed

Sector Feeds:

submit article

Wow — talk about a disaster. Bad news at AIG, Lehman, and throughout the financial sector led to a world-class pummeling on Wall Street. The Dow lost more than 504 points, while the S&P 500 dropped more than 4.6%, the worst single-day decline since right after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Definitely stay tuned to Money and Markets for more updates on where we're going next.

What else is on my mind? Well, whenever the pinstripe suit crowd in Manhattan starts to agree with me ... I get real worried.

I start to sweat ... I begin to question my research ... And I look for every possible hole in my conclusions.

Why?

Because the Wall Street crowd is better at being a day late and a dollar short than anybody I know. And I've learned over the years, that you can make a ton of money by NOT listening to them!

It's not that they're stupid

The Wall Street crowd isn't stupid. Heck, most of them attended more prestigious colleges than I did. And they can drop more names than I ever could.

So what has me worried?

The chief investment strategist at Citigroup just recommended that investors increase their stock portfolio's allocation in foreign stocks to 55%.

That's way, way up from the 30% he had been recommending. And it's roughly quadruple the 12% to 15% that the typical mutual fund investor owns in foreign funds.

Why the sudden and dramatic increase?

Jeffrey Applegate, the head of Citigroup's Global Wealth Management, said: "The primary engines of growth have shifted away from the United States. Investors need to position themselves to take advantage of global opportunities."

Applegate is right ... but a little late to the party.

From 2003 to the end of 2007, the average annual return for the Dow Jones Wilshire Emerging Markets Index was 46% while the S&P 500 only returned 12.8%.

Those gangbuster returns have increased the impact of foreign stocks on global markets. According to Russell Investments, the value of U.S. stocks in the world market fell below 50% in 2005. And now they only represent 43% of the capitalization of the Dow Jones Wilshire Global Total Market Index.

If you think those oversized returns mean that investing in foreign markets automatically means more risk ... you would be wrong. According to Morningstar, the standard deviation (a measure of an investment's volatility) of the U.S. stock market was 15.4 for the past 10 years. And for foreign stocks it was 15.5.

That's right. Investing in foreign markets has no more risk than investing in U.S. stocks ... plus you get paid a lot more for doing so.

China's the best house in a great neighborhood

I think Citigroup and Russell are dead right. And investors should have a meaningful, if not heavy, weighting in foreign stocks. I may be biased.

Next Page >>

 

 
Rate :  Rate this Commentary  


 Number of Comments (0) Post Comment
 
  
Good Rating(+1)    Bad Rating(-1)
No Data Found

 
 
  Home | Login |Research | Earnings | Scans | Chat Rooms | Charts | Submit Article | Join Blog Network | Contributors | Subscribe to RSS

copryright 2008 all rights reserved