Enter Symbol
Enter Search String
A Quick Look at the US Presidential Election
By: Afraid to Trade   Sunday, September 28, 2008 3:28 PM
Sectors: Politics

Join Blog Network
Alerts by Email
Research Articles
Stock Ranking Changes
Related RSS Feeds

Sector Feeds:

submit article

Whoever wins the White House in November will affect the economy and of course the Stock Market in different ways, so let’s take a quick look at the polls and see who’s up and what could transpire in the upcoming election just over a month away now.

By virtually all accounts, Democratic Senator Barack Obama leads Republican Senator John McCain in national polls, and Real Clear Politics averages multiple polls to come up with the aggregate Obama lead of 47.9% to 43.6% (a 4.3% advantage).

However, it’s not national polls or a national vote that elects the US President, it’s the series of state-wide elections and state-by-state results that contribute to an overall majority vote by electors in the Electoral College, and - not surprisingly - Senator Obama leads by almost all accounts in the all-important “Electoral Vote” count as it stands currently - which is always subject to change in light of significant new developments.

Real Clear Politics - an independent/non-partisan site - currently lists Senator Obama with 223 solid/leaning Electoral Votes to Senator McCain’s 163 vote total - it takes 270 Electoral Votes to win the Presidency.  RCP lists the remaining 147 votes as “Toss-Ups” from averaging polls that determine a lead less than 5% for a candidate.

Over the next month, watch the “Gray” states closely, as it will be voters in these states that will determine the next President of the USA.

So what is the current status according to RCP, if you assign all Toss-Up states according to the aggregate averages so far?

The RCP Average gives Senator Obama the edge currently - 286 votes to 252 for McCain, and if this holds until November 4th, Barack Obama would be the next US President.

It goes without saying that a lot can change between now and then, and plenty of websites will be full of information, punditry, analysis, commentary, projections, etc.

If you’re interesting in following closer, I suggest visiting some of the sites (all over the political spectrum) included in the “Three Blue Dudes” Presidential Election Projection Database which categorizes and updates 78 sites that hold their own projections (some through statistics, some through polls, others through ‘wishful thinking’) of the outcome of the Electoral College vote.

As it stands now, of the 78 sites, 69 sites project an Obama win; 4 project a McCain win; and 4 sites project a 269/269 EC Tie (which is a distinct possibility this year).

The Vice-Presidential Debate is yet to come, as are two more Presidential Debates, as well as the resolution of the Economic “Bail-out” Bill which is currently working its way through Congress.  The race so far has been quite eventful, and I suspect it will continue to be so until that fateful evening in November!

 


 

 
Rate :  Rate this Commentary  


 Number of Comments (1) Post Comment
 
  
Good Rating(+1)    Bad Rating(-1)
 
Title: The National Popular Vote
Posted by: susan
Sep 29, 2008 17:49
election, battleground states, polls, etc. The real issue is not how well Obama or McCain might do state-by-state, but that we shouldn't have battleground states and spectator states in the first place. Every vote in every state should be politically relevant in a presidential election. And, every vote should be equal. We should have a national popular vote for President in which the White House goes to the candidate who gets the most popular votes in all 50 states. The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral vote -- that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). Because of state-by-state enacted rules for winner-take-all awarding of their electoral votes, recent candidates with limited funds have concentrated their attention on a handful of closely divided "battleground" states. In 2004 two-thirds of the visits and money were focused in just six states; 88% on 9 states, and 99% of the money went to just 16 states. Two-thirds of the states and people have been merely spectators to the presidential election. Another shortcoming of the current system is that a candidate can win the Presidency without winning the most popular votes nationwide. The National Popular Vote bill has passed 21 state legislative chambers, including one house in Arkansas, Colorado, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, and both houses in California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont. The bill has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These four states possess 50 electoral votes-- 19% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
Reply Report Spam 1
Show Reply

 
 
  Home | Login |Research | Earnings | Scans | Chat Rooms | Charts | Submit Article | Join Blog Network | Contributors | Subscribe to RSS

copryright 2008 all rights reserved