Barr Announces Favorable Ruling in Razadyne(R) Patent Challenge
Thursday, August 28, 2008 8:49 AM
Symbols: BRL

MONTVALE, NJ, Aug. 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NYSE: BRL) today announced that the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware has ruled in favor of its subsidiary, Barr Laboratories, Inc., in the challenge of U.S. Patent No. 4,663,318 ('the '318 patent') listed by Ortho McNeil Janssen in connection with Janssen's Razadyne(R) (galantamine hydrobromide), 4mg, 8mg and 12mg tablets. The Court's decision will effectively end the 30-month stay with respect to Barr's generic Razadyne tablets and Barr's generic Razadyne ER (galantamine hydrobromide), 8 mg, 16 mg and 24 mg extended release capsules.

In her ruling, District Court Judge Robinson found that the '318 patent is invalid for lack of enablement. Judge Robinson also denied Janssen's request for a Temporary Restraining Order which would have prevented Barr from marketing its product.

'We are very pleased with the Court's decision invalidating the patent on Razadyne and we intend to launch our generic Razadyne product immediately following receipt of final FDA approval, which we expect imminently,' said Christine Mundkur, CEO of Barr Laboratories, Inc. 'We also are evaluating our options regarding a launch of our generic version of Razadyne ER,' Mundkur continued.

Barr filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) for Janssen's Razadyne (galantamine hydrobromide), 4 mg, 8 mg and 12 mg tablets on February 28, 2005, the first day that an ANDA containing a Paragraph IV certification could be submitted based on the expiration of the New Chemical Entity (NCE) exclusivity on the product. Following receipt of notification from the FDA of the application's acceptance for filing, Barr notified the New Drug Application (NDA) holder and patent owner of Barr's challenge to the patents protecting Razadyne. On June 15, 2005, Barr announced that Janssen had filed suit in the District Court for the District of Delaware, and the trial occurred in May 2007.

Janssen announced in its Form 10-Q filed with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission on May 10, 2005 that it had received Paragraph IV certifications for Razadyne tablets from six other generic pharmaceutical companies relating to the patents protecting Razadyne.

Barr also has a pending ANDA for Razadyne ER (galantamine hydrobromide), 8 mg, 16 mg and 24 mg extended release capsules. In its ANDA for that product, Barr certified that the '318 patent was invalid, unenforceable or not infringed. Barr subsequently amended its application to certify that an additional patent, U.S. Patent No. 7,160,559 ('the '559 patent'), which was not listed at the time Barr's original ANDA was filed, was invalid, unenforceable or not infringed. Janssen sued Barr in the District Court for the District of New Jersey on June 30, 2006. Pursuant to an Order in the case, Judge Robinson's decision in the District of Delaware will be given effect in the Razadyne ER litigation.


Next Page >>
More Options



Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 300 contributors and press releases, SEC filings and full text news from thousands of sources.


 
Rate :  Rate this Commentary  


 Number of Comments (0) Post Comment
 
  
Good Rating(+1)    Bad Rating(-1)
No Data Found

 
Enter Symbol
Enter Search String
Bookmark This Article
Email Article

Send this article by email


Recipient's Name
Recipient's E-mail
Your Name
Your E-mail
Related Quotes

 
  Home | Login |Research | Earnings | Scans | Chat Rooms | Charts | Submit Article | Join Blog Network | Contributors | Subscribe to RSS

copryright 2008 all rights reserved